Tag Archives: trailer manufacturer

Now There Are 10. Another Trailer Manufacturer Earns IIHS TOUGHGUARD Award

Fruehauf joins the ranks of trailer manufacturers to earn the IIHS TOUGHGUARD award. So all new dry van trailers, which Fruehauf sells after September 30, 2026, will be built to withstand a rear-end crash and prevent underride and deadly passenger compartment intrusion. Thank you, Fruehauf and IIHS!

While I’m grateful for this advancement in safety, I cannot help but think of the Fruehauf trailers which were manufactured between July 15, 2024 — the date when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) required compliance with their too-weak 2022 rear impact guard rule (which did not require the TOUGHGUARD level of strength) — and September 30, 2026. Do the math with me: Fruehauf averages 13,000 new trailers manufactured annually. Times two years. 26,000 trailers on the road without a TOUGHGUARD. With a 10-15 year road-use life expectancy. 26,000 trailers which could potentially be rear-ended — resulting in underride and lethal passenger compartment intrusion.

Something’s wrong with this picture.

[I wonder if brokers realize the liability risk posed by the hundreds of thousands (millions?) of trailers which are transporting goods across this country’s roads without adequate underride protection.]

Here are the North American truck rear underride guard ratings from IIHS: Recognizing good rear underride protection

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety PRESS RELEASE:

Fruehauf dry van trailer earns IIHS award for underride protection
ARLINGTON, Va. — Kentucky-based Fruehauf is the latest semitrailer manufacturer to earn the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s TOUGHGUARD award for superior underride protection.

The award applies to the company’s 53-foot dry van trailers built after Sept. 30, 2026.

A dry van trailer is a fully enclosed semitrailer designed for freight. Fruehauf offers models with walls made from composite and aluminum, both of which earn the award.

“We’re excited to add Fruehauf to the list of trailer makers offering superior protection for other road users,” IIHS President David Harkey said. “The TOUGHGUARD award continues to be a key part of our strategy for improving the safety of commercial vehicles.”

A rear underride guard is a metal frame attached to the back of a large truck to prevent lower-riding vehicles from sliding beneath the trailer in the event of a rear-end crash. Semitrailers are required to have rear underride guards that meet federal safety standards. However, IIHS research and crash tests have shown that many can buckle or break off in a crash.

Underride guards that meet the TOUGHGUARD criteria are substantially more likely to withstand an impact, reducing the severity of the crash.

To earn the IIHS award, the rear guard must be strong enough to prevent underride by a midsize car when it rear-ends the trailer with its full width, a 50% overlap and a 30% overlap. The 30% overlap configuration is the most challenging, because one corner of the underride guard must absorb all the force of the impact.

Initially, these tests were conducted in-house. Now IIHS allows trailer manufacturers to submit data and footage from tests conducted at their own facilities or by contractors for IIHS experts to review. The tests of Fruehauf’s dry van trailer were conducted by MGA Research Corporation.

This is the first of Fruehauf’s trailers to qualify for the TOUGHGUARD award. Ten North American trailer manufacturers have earned the accolade since the program was launched in 2017.

$462M Jury Verdict Over Rear Impact Guard Design

For over 50 years, NHTSA has failed to require truck trailers to be equipped with underride guards that protect road users from death and injury. The industry has lobbied to keep it that way and tens of thousands of innocent people have lost their lives as a result. This week, a St. Louis jury made a trailer manufacturer pay a just price.

Why would the jury do so? Could it have been because Wabash continued to sell an inadequate rear impact guard as standard equipment — even though they have a safer option available — and because of the industry’s opposition and the government’s abandonment of public safety?

Justice has been served.

MEDIA COVERAGE

Jury Found Trailer Manufacturer Negligent In Side Underride Death

A New Mexico jury found a trailer manufacturer “negligent” yesterday in a side underride fatality. “The family hopes the verdict ‘sends a message’ to the truck-trailer industry to take measures to prevent underride crashes.” Read more here.

Everyone, please call Congress at this D.C. phone no. and ask for your U.S. Senators and Representatives. When you get transferred to their office, simply tell the staffer that you want their boss to cosponsor the STOP Underrides Bill (S.665 and HR.1511): (202) 224-3121.

Thank you, Eric Hein and family. Thinking of you and all underride victims. Precious ones gone too soon. Never forgotten. 

#STOPunderrides Enough is enough!

Underride Question: Litigation or Legislation?

We would have liked to see the DOT and trucking industry solve the underride problem on their own because it is the right thing to do. Because they have not, we are now faced with the question: Litigation or Legislation?

Last week, a side underride case in Texas was settled as a wrongful death suit. The trailer manufacturer acknowledged their failure to act to install technology which could have prevented the death of Kathryn Dodgen:

http://www.houstonpress.com/news/family-files-wrongful-death-lawsuit-against-a-trailer-manufacturer-after-deadly-crash-7704640

Kathy’s family and their lawyers believe the accident was entirely preventable—and so this week, they filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the trailer’s manufacturer, PJ Trailers. In the lawsuit, they accuse the manufacturer of releasing a defectively designed product onto the market, violating Texas’s products liability laws. The trailer didn’t have any side guards that would have prevented Kathryn’s car from going underneath it.

What does this mean for the future? Likely, with the hundreds if not thousands of underride deaths (and debilitating injuries) which occur every year in this country, there will be many more such lawsuits filed because of the precedent that this case has set.

How do we want this to play out? Do we want the trucking industry to face massive loss due to this de facto standard which will hold them liable for these preventable underride tragedies? Or do we want to protect them from litigation through legislation which will provide them underride standards to follow?

May 12, 2018, mwk

Update: Other posts on Underride Litigation

A grieving dad got the attention of the trucking industry & made a difference.

Rather than wait for a stronger underride rule to be proposed, Jerry Karth, in early 2014, determined to challenge the truck industry to voluntarily step up and strengthen underride protection on trucks.

He wrote letters, first of all, to the major trailer manufacturers — some of whom had been tested earlier by IIHS. He told them about our crash story — how AnnaLeah (17) and Mary (13) through no fault of their own were killed by truck underride which might have been prevented if the truck they collided with had had better underride guards.

Then, soon after those letters were out the door, Jerry had several more lists of trucking companies, who either purchased or leased trailers. He proceeded to write letters to those companies — again telling them our crash story and making sure that they understood the inadequacy of guards designed to satisfy the current U.S. underride standard, or even the Canadian one for that matter.

Jerry asked them to look into the matter — even providing them with copies of the IIHS Status Reports which had articles on the underride issue. He asked them to make sure that they were getting their trailers from manufacturers which provided the best protection possible. He received letters, emails, and phone calls indicating that the companies were appreciative of the information provided to them.

Then, several months ago, Jerry got a call from Greer Woodruff, VP of Safety, Security, & Driver Personnel at J.B. Hunt a transport company. Greer was calling to tell Jerry that JB Hunt had purchased 4,000 new trailers in January 2016 from Wabash who had recently manufactured safer underride guards–having passed the IIHS 30% overlap crash test.

Underride Roundtable TimelineUnderride Roundtable May 5, 2016 141Underride Roundtable May 5, 2016 169Underride Roundtable May 5, 2016 007

See my posts with exciting developments on this front:

And later, during the afternoon panel discussion at the Underride Roundtable at IIHS on May 5, Jerry asked Mark Roush from Vanguard (a trailer manufacturer) what had motivated them to produce their recently-strengthened underride guards. This was what he found out:

“We had no idea if there would be a safety marketplace for large trucks when we began our crash tests,” Matthew Brumbelow, an IIHS senior research engineer who has extensively studied truck underride crashes, shared with the audience. “We at the Institute have been really encouraged by the response from trailer manufacturers.”

Mark Roush, vice president of engineering with Vanguard, participated in the afternoon panel discussion. Vanguard is one of the trailer manufacturers that voluntarily improved their underride guards. Roush credited IIHS research and the Karth family’s advocacy for raising awareness of the underride problem and ways to address it.

“As far as we knew we were producing trailers to what we thought was the highest regulatory standard, and then the IIHS test came in and made us aware of what was happening,” Roush said. “Three of our largest customers forwarded letters from you [Karth] asking us to do more.” The Karths personally wrote the largest trailer makers seeking their help in building better rear guards.

David Zuby, IIHS executive vice president and chief research officer, wrapped up the day with a call for continued cooperation and research.

“The one thing I hope everyone takes away from this is that there has been a lot of progress in recent years on underride crashes, and there will be more ahead. We heard from Virginia Tech students who are about to graduate and are already thinking about how to make underride guards better. And you heard from Matt Brumbelow about how guards are being designed to prevent types of underride crashes that weren’t addressed before. We are optimistic that we can solve this problem working together.” See more at: IIHS: Truck underride roundtable addresses problem of deadly crashes

It needs to be said, as I have stated before, that the positive progress made by the trailer manufacturers voluntarily — though it should be appreciated — should, nevertheless, not be allowed to stand as the end of the line. Unless they pass crash tests at higher speeds, the manufacturers need to get back to the drawing board and find ways to make their trucks safer all around (including on the sides and at the front) and at higher speeds.

And, unless trucks currently on the road are retrofitted and Single Unit Trucks become included in underride standards, way too many people will continue to die on our roads from preventable underride.

Nurenberg, Paris, Heller & McCarthy ALMFTS facebook banner

I think that it would make Mary & AnnaLeah smile to think that their lives were the impetus for saving others from an untimely end and untold heartache.

Never forgotten

To read additional posts which I wrote as a follow-up to the Underride Roundtable, go here:  Underride Roundtable Follow-up Posts