Tag Archives: collaboration

Save the Date (April 17): Side Guard Task Force Meeting

The Purpose of this meeting will be to collaboratively discuss Strategies to Solve the Side Underride Problem

UPDATE: Due to the coronavirus pandemic, we are changing the format of this to a Zoom meeting. Let us know if you would like to join us!

1. Opening Remarks

2. Setting the Stage for our Consensus Task: Systems Thinking Group Exercise to identify systemic factors impacting resolution of the underride problem, Kristin Hassmiller Lich & Becky Naumann, UNC SPH

3. Collaborative Discussion of Specifications for Side Guards, Andy Young, Facilitator

4. Lunch

5. Collaborative Discussion of a Plan for Implementation of Industry-wide Installation of Side Guard Solutions, Andy Young, Facilitator

6. Wrapping up: Next Steps in This Process

Side Guard Task Force SAVE THE DATE 2

How To End Underride: “That’s how we’re gonna win. Not fighting what we hate, but saving what we love.”

Some people think that I am stuck in grief. Some people think that my advocacy is too full of anger. Actually, I’m not perfect in how I am handling this, but I have to say some things because I hate being misunderstood and maybe clarifying it will help to open some minds to getting this problem resolved.

I have already forgiven the truck driver who started the chain of events which led to my daughters’ deaths.  While we think that he could have done a lot of things to be a safer driver, the crash could have turned out quite differently had there been an effective rear underride guard (rear impact guard or Mansfield Bar) on the back of the trailer with which we collided.

In that scenario, there would likely have been no fatalities and the truck driver would not have had his CDL taken away for two years with a negative impact on his career. But, in fact, he is one of the victims as well as AnnaLeah and Mary and my family.

However, I continue to deal with the frustration — and thus anger — which comes with the ongoing revelation of deception and inaction on the part of government and industry — over & over again. It is a chicken and egg situation where everyone can too easily justify waiting for someone else to take responsibility. So the end result is that  no one is held accountable to solve the underride problem.

Quite likely those who could do something about it might think or act differently if their job was not on the line or if they did not feel constrained by what they thought needed to be done to protect some organizational goal — never mind if they really looked at the whole picture they would understand that solving the underride problem would be win/win for everyone.  And, of course, if they lost someone they loved due to underride, they (like me) would quite possibly move heaven and earth to end these preventable tragedies.

So what do I do with that anger and frustration? I channel it into actions which will hopefully raise awareness to bring about a paradigm shift in wrong-headed thinking and lead to effective collaboration to get this taken care of once and for all.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety asked for a quote after our original underride petition led to the start of NHTSA rulemaking in 2014:

Karth says the Institute “played an important part in our efforts. First of all, your research and reports enlightened us and then that led to us being enraged and asking the question, ‘If something could be done to make underride guards stronger, then why wasn’t it being done?’ That, of course, led to us being empowered to educate and motivate others to join with us in asking for change.”

That quest will continue on until we see victory and right the wrong. Fortunately, we know, like David, that the battle is the Lord’s. So we seek for wisdom and we continually lay down our reactions at the foot of the cross in the knowledge that we war not against flesh and blood but against the powers and principalities which would pit us against each other instead of pulling together.

After all, this is not about getting the truck industry to get in line — or else. To quote Rose in The Last JediThat’s how we’re gonna win. Not fighting what we hate, saving what we love.

“Public Health’s Contribution to Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention”

Just read a great article, Public Health’s Contribution to Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention, and sent an email off to the author, Dr. Patricia F. Waller — only to find that she died in 2003. Wish I could have met her and strategized with her.

Some excerpts:

  • The evidence on occupant restraints began accumulating
    almost as soon as safety belts were first available
    in passenger vehicles. As other nations enacted legislation
    and belt usage rose, the data clearly showed the
    life-saving effects. Even so, in this country little was
    done to translate findings into legislation and enforcement.
    Legislators were presented with what we in the
    academic community considered convincing evidence,
    and were told, “Is that all you have? I could never get
    this out of committee!” It was easy to become
    discouraged.
  • It was citizen action groups that provided the impetus
    for major changes in public policy governing drinking
    and driving. Their activities generated public support
    for enforcement of existing laws and enactment of new
    ones. Research findings were translated into laws and
    programs.
  • Data alone were not sufficient to bring about major
    changes in policies affecting individual behavior. Success
    is attributable to a wide range of participants,
    including legislative, enforcement, judicial, public
    health, medical, and public organizations and advocates.
    The individual and community actions that resulted were fostered by education, stimulated by social norms, and encouraged through public policy, and are
    examples of the value of taking a health promotion
    approach to motor vehicle injury prevention.
  • The CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and
    Control is playing the major role in developing and
    sustaining researchers in injury prevention—a role that
    must clearly continue. The benefits to society from
    the public investment in research and training in this
    field are enormous in both human and monetary
    terms. With over 41,000 deaths annually, motor vehicle
    crashes remain a major preventable public health problem.
    Implementation of the recommendations in this
    supplement holds the promise of further reducing what
    remains an unacceptable toll.

Letter from NHTSA re: our truck underride rulemaking efforts

I have been reading and sending emails this week to the group which met at IIHS on June 24 to discuss recommendations to NHTSA on the underride rulemaking. It has been encouraging to see that the process is proving more helpful than anything that has been accomplished in the past to gain cooperation through collaborative communication. But it has also been discouraging to see evidence that compromise is being considered.

Then, I opened my email and saw that I had received a letter from NHTSA today — letting me know that they regretted not being able to accept our invitation to attend our Underride Roundtable follow-up meeting at IIHS on June 24, 2016.

They also said that they look forward to our recommendations and encourage our continued submissions to the public dockets for NHTSA’s rulemakings on truck underride safety.

They thanked us for our leadership and for partnering with them to improve roadway safety.

Letter from Ryan Posten, NHTSA, July 6, 2016

Letter from NHTSA July 6, 2016

Thank you

Keep truckin’ — one step at a time.

SIGN  & SHARE the TRAFFIC SAFETY OMBUDSMAN Petition:  https://wh.gov/i6kUj

PLEASE NOTE: If you sign the petition, be sure to go to your email. We the People will send you an email which you have to reply to in order to confirm your signature is valid.