I just received the webcast link for the upcoming Truck Underride Roundtable at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS):
Webcast Link for Truck Underride Roundtable at IIHS on May 5, 2016
I just received the webcast link for the upcoming Truck Underride Roundtable at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS):
Webcast Link for Truck Underride Roundtable at IIHS on May 5, 2016
I’ve been thinking about the challenge of improving the traffic safety outlook even with the promises of collision avoidance technology and self-driving vehicles. I keep thinking: What about the fact that many people still own and buy used cars? So, today, I finally looked it up.
Used car sales in 2014: 36,241,800
New car sales in 2014: about 7,687,570
How long will it take for the whole system to hold safer technology? And, meanwhile, will we do what can be done along other fronts to make our roads safer?
See this post: Australia has embraced Vision Zero. What about US?
A vision can serve to direct decisions and actions. What are we waiting for?
Tell Obama you are standing with us in this: “Family Continues Fight for Trucking Safety”
Read this recent article: The Absurd Primacy of the Automobile in American Life
Considering the constant fatalities, rampant pollution, and exorbitant costs of ownership, there is no better word to characterize the car’s dominance than insane.
. . . cars’ most dramatic cost: They waste lives. They are one of America’s leading causes of avoidable injury and death, especially among the young. Oddly, the most immediately devastating consequence of the modern car—the carnage it leaves in its wake—seems to generate the least public outcry and attention. Jim McNamara, a sergeant with the California Highway Patrol, where officers spend 80 percent of their time responding to car wrecks, believes such public inattention and apathy arise whenever a problem is “massive but diffuse.”
I wrote about that kind of apathy here: Numbers are funny: 1 (crash story) is a tragedy; 1 million (crash stories) is a statistic
This sounds like a great conference put on by the Center for Study of Responsive Law with Ralph Nader. Wish I could go:
“The theme of this citizen mobilization will be elaborating ways to break through power to secure long-overdue democratic solutions made possible by a new muscular civic nexus between local communities and Washington, D.C. On these four days, speakers will present innovative ideas and strategies designed to take existing civic groups to higher levels of effectiveness.”
Ralph Nader Presents: Breaking Through Power: A Historic Civic Mobilization

Will consequences dealt to VW for deceitful actions have adequate impact on future industry actions? VW forges U.S. deal arising from diesel emissions scandal
Lou Lombardo, Care for Crash Victims, asks another important question: How much of the costs will be paid by taxpayers? The answer is still unknown.
And, I ask, will a civil settlement punish criminal negligence appropriately? Should executives be jailed for corporate crimes?
I say that a White House Vision Zero Task Force should be established and this issue of corporate negligence in matters of health & death should be one of the matters they address–tout de suite! Do it, President Obama, for We the People of this United States of America! #VisionZero
Updated version of our 689-page Vision Zero Petition Book 3rd Edition
On May 5, 2016, over 65 representatives from the trucking industry, government, safety advocates, engineers, crash reconstructionists, attorneys, and media will be on hand at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s Vehicle Research Center to discuss and demonstrate truck underride crashes.
In addition, the Underride Roundtable, which will be taking place from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., will be available to watch via livestreaming–with viewer interaction anticipated. The webcast link will be provided here when it is available.
Webcast Link to the Underride Roundtable is now ready for registration for this upcoming event! Webcast Link for Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Underride Roundtable
Underride Roundtable Agenda May 5, 2016
Vision Zero Petition Book 3rd Edition
Truck Underride Roundtable is one week away! May it be sehr gut!
In order to prepare for that, I am going to highlight some past and current underride research papers and efforts here. It will, of course, not cover everything and others are welcome to send additional information my way, which I would be more than happy to add to the list.
Although most of the research below will not appear as a presentation on the agenda, I am hopeful that the information will be considered by all as recommendations for underride protection are discussed and proposed.
I had actually wanted to put together a packet of this kind of information to hand out to participants. Then I thought that it might be more useful to provide it to a wider audience by posting it on our website. So here it is.
In addition, I have prepared a feedback form to enable you to let me know what you think should be done about truck underride protection. I am hoping to get a good response and will compile any results which I receive before the Underride Roundtable, as well as after the event.
Please print my Dragon Underride Protector Wish List, fill in your answers, scan it, and email it to me at marianne@annaleahmary.com.
Although I don’t know all the names and details, I imagine that there are countless individuals and organizations who have contributed, over a span of many years, to the discussion and development of underride protection. I am thankful that we can build upon that foundation.
Here is some of the research which I have come across in my search for the best possible protection.
Update, May 21, 2016: Other Research Not Listed Below: See this post, Other Research Which Should Not Be Ignored in Current Underride Rulemaking
Australian Underride Research:
Virginia Tech Senior Underride Design Team:
Aaron Kiefer (North Carolina) Innovative Side/Rear Underride Research:
German Researchers:
34 Public Comments on the current NHTSA Rear Underride Rulemaking can be found here: NPRM Upgrade Underide.
73 Public Comments on the current ANPRM for Single Unit Trucks: ANPRM Underride Protection of Single Unit Trucks
Please note this comment in particular: Perry Ponder, Seven Hills Engineering, Comment from Seven Hills Engineering, LLC with reference to a 1969 DOT document indicating their intention to extend underride protection to the sides of large vehicles: Regulators, manufacturers, & advocates need to read this engineer’s comment on truck underride
Also, note that Seven Hills sponsored a Senior Capstone Project at FSU College of Engineering in 2010/11 to design a side guard: Side Underride Guard w/ Aerodynamic Fairing – Senior Design Fall 2010—Spring 2011
Other:
And last, but not least, out of the mouths of babes. . .
NOTE: I will likely be updating this post as we get closer to the Underride Roundtable on May 5, 2016! And, of course, I can hardly wait to post the results of the Roundtable itself!
In memory of AnnaLeah & Mary, Precious Ones whose lives were cut far too short.
Western Australia has embraced Vision Zero. What about the US?
A vision can serve to direct decisions and actions. What are we waiting for?
Do it, President Obama, for We the People of this United States of America! #VisionZero
No matter what causes a crash, when underride occurs, it is the victim who pays the price.
The Standards Australia recently-released proposed rear underrun rule says this in Commentary G of its STANDARDS AUSTRALIA Rear Underride Proposed Rule:
“Around twelve fatalities occur each year as a result of truck underruns in Australia. The injuries are usually horrific (see references in paragraph G7.2.1. for Rechnitzer & Foong [1991], Rechnitzer & Grzebieta [1991], Grzebieta & Rechnitzer [2001], Lambert & Rechnitzer [2002], Brumbelow [2011], & IIHS [2014]).
“Given that Australia has adopted a ‘Vision Zero’ road safety philosophy and the ‘Safe System Approach’ road safety strategy, all such foreseen fatalities need to be addressed if a design countermeasure can be implemented.
“The U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has also identified that the truck underrun fatalities and serious injuries are occurring as a result of inadequate truck underrun barriers and the lack of a crash performance test standard (IIHS 2014). They have rated a number of underrun barriers using a performance crash test protocol they recently developed.”
Clearly, they get it: if a fatality is predictable, and a solution exists which could prevent it, then it should be implemented!
See previous post on this topic: Good news from Australia: A Stronger Rear Underride Guard Rule Has Been Proposed!
Are you listening, Congress, everyone involved in the trucking industry and traffic safety advocacy, and especially, right now, President Obama?!
Life & Death Traffic Safety Problems Deserve Proper Treatment: Not Political Tug-of-War Game!
AnnaLeah & Mary, we miss you so much!
Towards Zero: There’s no one someone won’t miss.
Yesterday, I received good news on underride rulemaking from the Australian front. George Rechnitzer and Raphael Grzebieta were able to impact Standards Australia to issue a proposed rear underride rule which will be much stronger than their current rule (and than U.S. underride rules) and which will require a crash test.
Comments will be accepted through June 22, 2016 on the proposed standard: STANDARDS AUSTRALIA Rear Underride Proposed Rule
The following is the letter which I received from Raphael Grzebieta, as well as the letter which he received from Standards Australia:
Hi Marianne,
Great news! Our Australian/New Zealand National Standard is now out for public comment before it is ratified as a standard for regulators (DOTs) and others in Australia and New Zealand.
We will be the first kids on the planet releasing such a standard that demands a crash test for an underrun barrier fixed to the rear of a heavy truck.
It has taken more than a quarter of a century (and many horrific deaths) but George and I have finally done it at last. We got it into the Standard.
There was some resistance by one of the DOTs but after some strong persuasion (by me and other DOTs, particularly NZ) at a couple of key Standards Committee meetings, all DOTs are on board with it now.
See attached – Section 7 and Appendix G.
Any one of you (and others – please email it out) are of course most welcome to submit a comment to Standards Australia. Good comments I hope.
All the best.
Kind Regards
Raphael
Raphael Grzebieta PhD (Professor, Road Safety)
Australian Naturalistic Driver Study, Lead Chief Investigator
www.ands.unsw.edu.au
The letter to Raphael from Standards Australia:
Dear Raphael Grzebieta,
Please note that the following draft is open for public comment:
|
Draft Number: |
AS/NZS 3845.2 |
|
Title: |
Roadside safety systems and devices – Temporary work sites, bollards, light poles and sign supports |
|
Project Committee: |
CE-033 Road Safety Barrier Systems |
|
Public Comment Closing Date: |
22/06/2016 23:59 |
You can view the draft and any incoming comments here after entering your Standards Hub login details.
All comments are to be submitted on the Standards Hub. Follow the link above, login and select the “New Comment” button.
If you have any queries regarding the submission of comments, please contact us on the details given below or contact the relevant Project Manager.
Kind Regards
Standards Australia
Level 10, 20 Bridge Street, Sydney NSW 2000, GPO Box 476 Sydney NSW 2001
P +61 2 9237 6171 FreeCall 1800 035 822 F +61 2 9237 6010 mail@standards.org.au
www.standards.org.au
Standards Australia is an independent, not-for-profit organisation, recognised
by the Australian Government as the peak non-government Standards body in Australia. Standards Australia develops internationally aligned Australian Standards® that deliver Net Benefit to Australia and is the Australian member of ISO and IEC,
Standards Australia is the Principal Sponsor of the Australian International Design Awards www.designawards.com.au